A July 22, 2026 Sina report summarizing the World Artificial Intelligence Conference’s safety forum says organizers unveiled five flagship outputs on AI‑agent risk, including a “Ten Legal Principles for Healthy Agent Services,” the first global operational safety standard for AI agents, and multiple governance blueprints. The article also notes that 29 countries signed an agreement in Shanghai to launch the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization and adopt joint action plans on AI ethics, interoperability and emergency response.
This article aggregates reporting from 3 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
While much Western coverage of WAIC focused on flashy demos, the Chinese‑language media put heavy emphasis on governance outputs aimed specifically at preventing agents from “going out of control.” The safety forum rolled out five flagship deliverables: a set of ten legal principles for healthy agent services; what’s described as the first global operational safety standard for AI agents; and a cluster of action plans and blueprints that tie those tools into China’s broader legal stack—updated cybersecurity law, data security law and personal information protection law. ([k.sina.com.cn](https://k.sina.com.cn/article_7879996427_1d5af340b06801kbf0.html)) Layered on top is the creation of a World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization, with 29 countries signing on to shared ethics, interoperability and emergency‑response initiatives.
For the AGI race, this is China trying to define the rules of the agentic era as much as the technology itself. If these standards gain traction in Belt‑and‑Road and Global South markets, they could become the default compliance target for any lab hoping to sell agentic systems into that bloc—much the way the EU’s GDPR set de facto norms for data privacy worldwide. The focus on long‑horizon agent risks, legal accountability and graded safety testing also rhymes with the kinds of incidents we are now seeing from frontier labs in the US. ([k.sina.com.cn](https://k.sina.com.cn/article_7857201856_1d45362c001908cf42.html?from=tech)) In practice, the labs and countries that can plug their own technical evaluations into emerging international standards will have more say in how “responsible AGI” is defined, and which deployment models are treated as acceptable versus reckless.


