On June 25, 2026, the Dominican Republic announced it will soon approve by presidential decree a National Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence governing public-sector AI use. Vice President Raquel Peña unveiled the plan at UNESCO’s third regional ministerial summit on AI ethics in Santo Domingo, saying the country aims to be among the first in Latin America with a national AI ethics framework. The code was drafted by national digital and ethics agencies with input from more than 100 public, private, academic and civil-society organizations.
This article aggregates reporting from 1 news source. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The Dominican Republic’s move to codify AI ethics for the public sector is a reminder that AI governance is no longer just a US‑EU‑China story. Smaller states are starting to translate UNESCO‑style principles into concrete administrative rules that will govern procurement, data practices and acceptable use. That matters for the race to AGI because global deployment of powerful models will increasingly hinge on whether they can be configured to fit a patchwork of national frameworks like this one.
The emphasis on a multisector drafting process and alignment with UNESCO’s AI ethics recommendation also shows how quickly soft law hardens into domestic policy. Once a national code exists, it becomes the reference point for courts, regulators and civil society when something goes wrong with an automated decision system. For frontier labs and integrators, that raises the bar on documentation, auditability and human‑rights impact assessment, even in relatively small markets.
For Latin America and the Caribbean, the Santo Domingo summit and this forthcoming code signal an ambition to shape AI norms rather than simply import them from Brussels or Washington. Over time, that could influence how regional cloud deals, data‑center buildouts and sovereign AI projects are structured.

