On May 27, 2026, The Verge reported that AI‑detection analyses suggest parts of Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on artificial intelligence, Magnifica Humanitas, may have been drafted using AI tools. The Vatican released the encyclical on May 25, 2026, as a major moral statement warning about the societal risks of concentrated AI power.
This article aggregates reporting from 4 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The irony of a papal encyclical warning about AI power potentially containing AI‑generated passages is almost too on the nose — and that’s exactly why it matters. It shows just how quickly generative tools are diffusing into elite knowledge work, even within institutions that present themselves as moral counterweights to Silicon Valley. If an encyclical can quietly lean on AI drafting, it’s a safe bet that government white papers, legal opinions and corporate codes of ethics are doing the same.
For the race to AGI, this episode is less about capability and more about legitimacy. The Vatican is one of the few actors able to frame AI as a spiritual and ethical issue for billions of people. If its flagship document is partially AI‑written, that complicates the narrative of “human wisdom overseeing machine power” and illustrates how hard it will be to police provenance in high‑stakes texts. It also shows AI detectors are already influencing discourse at the top of global institutions, despite real questions about their accuracy.
The deeper story is that AI is becoming an invisible co‑author of the social contract. As systems help draft laws, sermons and policies, we’ll need new norms around disclosure and accountability. Otherwise, people may feel the rules of the AI age were, quite literally, written by the very tools they’re being asked to trust.

