Chinese outlets on December 29, 2025 reported new remarks by AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton, who told CNN that AI could replace “many, many jobs” by 2026, particularly in white-collar work. Hinton said he believes the tasks AI can perform roughly double every seven months, and noted that systems can already substitute for call center roles and increasingly handle longer coding projects.
This article aggregates reporting from 3 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
Hinton’s warning won’t surprise anyone inside the field, but the way it’s being amplified in Chinese financial media is notable. Positioning 2026 as the year AI “has the real ability to replace many, many jobs” frames current systems not as toys but as near‑term macroeconomic shocks, especially for white‑collar workers. The claim that task capacity doubles every seven months is more rhetorical than rigorously measured, yet it captures the lived experience of many teams watching capabilities and productization accelerate in parallel.
For the AGI conversation, his comments blur the line between narrow automation and more general intelligence. If systems can go from one‑minute coding snippets to hour‑long projects and then to multi‑month software builds with modest human oversight, we’re functionally much closer to agentic, general‑purpose problem solvers than classic task‑specific tools. That doesn’t mean human‑level AGI is around the corner, but it does mean labor markets will feel AGI‑like effects well before formal definitions are met.
The risk is political backlash and overcorrection. If 2026 does bring a visible wave of white‑collar displacement, there will be strong pressure to slow or redirect frontier development—whether by regulation, taxation or public procurement. Labs and governments that take such warnings seriously now will be better placed to manage that shock rather than be blindsided by it.