The push for a unified federal framework for AI regulation signals a significant shift towards centralizing authority over AI standards, reducing the risk of fragmented state-level policies. This trend aims to enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global AI market while responding to national security concerns, benefiting major tech firms that prefer a consistent regulatory environment. However, it may disrupt state-level oversight and consumer protections, igniting debates over the balance between innovation and regulation.

U.S. President Donald Trump said he will sign an executive order this week to create a single federal "One Rule" framework for artificial intelligence, aiming to preempt a growing patchwork of state-level AI regulations. The move is backed by major tech and AI firms that argue divergent state rules would stifle innovation, but is drawing bipartisan concern from states and lawmakers who see it as an overreach that weakens local protections and oversight.

President Donald Trump said he will sign a 'ONE RULE' executive order this week to establish a single federal approval framework for artificial intelligence, preempting individual U.S. state AI laws that he argues threaten innovation. The move, backed by major AI firms and investors, would bar states from enforcing their own AI safeguards and is already drawing sharp criticism from state officials and lawmakers who warn it could undercut consumer protections and invite legal challenges.
U.S. President Donald Trump met Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in Washington to discuss export controls on advanced AI chips and afterwards publicly praised Huang, calling him a "great leader" in technology. The meeting underscores Nvidia’s central role in U.S.–China tech tensions and suggests the company is directly lobbying on how restrictive future AI hardware controls should be.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with President Trump and Republican senators on Capitol Hill to discuss export controls on advanced AI chips, saying he supports federal export control policy but warning against state-by-state AI regulation, which he called a national security risk. Coverage in U.S. and Indian outlets highlights Huang’s push for a single federal AI standard that preserves U.S. competitiveness while allowing Nvidia to continue selling powerful AI processors globally, including to China, under controlled conditions.