On July 17, 2026, Cybernews reported that Greece’s ruling New Democracy party has proposed amendments to its EU AI Act implementation that would criminalize removing watermarks from AI‑generated deepfakes. The proposal would introduce prison sentences on top of fines already used in other EU states to enforce transparency rules for synthetic media.
This article aggregates reporting from 1 news source. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
Greece is stress-testing how far democracies are willing to go in criminalizing abuses of synthetic media. The underlying EU AI Act already requires deepfakes to be clearly labeled, but leaves enforcement to member states. By moving from fines to possible prison time for removing watermarks, Athens is signalling that it sees AI‑generated disinformation as closer to election tampering or hate speech than to ordinary copyright infringement.
For the broader AI race, this is part of a pattern: as generative models get better at mimicking reality, the regulatory perimeter keeps expanding from models themselves to the entire information stack—tooling, watermarks, platforms and end‑users. That creates real compliance overhead for anyone shipping open‑weight models or media tools into the EU, especially if other countries copy Greece’s approach. At the same time, aggressive penalties could push actors toward more robust watermarking standards and verification protocols, which in turn may force frontier labs to bake provenance and traceability more deeply into their training and inference pipelines.


