On December 24, 2025, Moneycontrol reported on a new OpenAI post arguing that 2026 progress toward AGI will depend less on new frontier models and more on how people actually use existing ones. OpenAI highlighted a growing “capability overhang” between what today’s systems can do and how they are deployed in real‑world workflows.
This article aggregates reporting from 1 news source. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
OpenAI reframing 2026 as a year of “closing the capability overhang” is a subtle but important pivot. Instead of hyping yet another massive model, the company is effectively admitting that current systems already outstrip how most people and organizations use them. The bottleneck, in its view, is no longer pure capability; it’s product design, process change and user education.([moneycontrol.com](https://www.moneycontrol.com/technology/openai-has-an-important-ai-prediction-for-2026-here-s-what-to-expect-article-13741497.html))
For the AGI race, this is both a confidence signal and a warning. It implies OpenAI believes its flagship GPT‑5.2‑class models are already in a regime where marginal capability gains matter less than integration into tools, agents and domain‑specific workflows. That will nudge competitors toward building ecosystems—assistants, app platforms, enterprise integrations—rather than just model demos. It also suggests that whoever can compress the “time to value” for non‑expert users may effectively pull AGI’s impact forward, even if the underlying science advances at a steadier pace.
Strategically, this framing helps justify heavier investment in agents, orchestration layers and vertical solutions, areas that can be monetized more directly than raw API calls. It also gives regulators a clearer target: if impact depends on deployment choices, not just models, then governance should focus on use‑cases and interfaces as much as on training runs.



