South Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT and the AI Safety Research Institute on December 22 launched the “AI Challenge for Error-Free Information,” a month-long public campaign to collect real-world hallucinations from commercial generative AI services. Citizens are invited to submit incorrect AI outputs, which will be verified by experts and forwarded to AI providers with recommendations for fixes.
This article aggregates reporting from 1 news source. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
Korea’s ‘AI challenge’ campaign is a clever way to scale safety oversight using the public as a sensor network. By inviting users to submit screenshots of hallucinations from deployed systems and routing them through an AI Safety Research Institute, the government is effectively crowdsourcing red‑teaming and post‑deployment monitoring. That’s a very different posture from purely pre‑deployment licensing: it assumes models will fail in the wild and builds institutional muscle to respond.([dwbnews.kr](https://www.dwbnews.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=107780))
For the frontier race, this is another sign that safety and reliability are becoming part of national AI strategies, not just lab‑internal QA. If Korean regulators can turn campaign outputs into systematic feedback loops with vendors—changing training data, prompting strategies or guardrails—they’ll be nudging commercial models toward more conservative, evidence‑grounded behavior in Korean contexts. That might slow the deployment of bleeding‑edge features but could also make the systems stickier and more trusted in critical areas like education or healthcare.
More broadly, the initiative foreshadows a world where governments routinely convene citizens to help stress‑test models, much like bug‑bounty programs in cybersecurity. Frontier labs will need to design interfaces and logging that make those collaborations possible without leaking sensitive data.



