A March 5, 2026 analysis based on The Information’s reporting says OpenAI has reached a $25 billion annualized revenue run rate, while rival Anthropic has climbed to about $19 billion. The gap between the two has narrowed sharply over the last year as Anthropic’s Claude products gained enterprise traction.
This article aggregates reporting from 4 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The revenue curves now look like a duel, not a blowout. OpenAI is still on top at a $25 billion annual run rate, but Anthropic closing to roughly $19 billion in just a few quarters is extraordinary by any tech standard. Those numbers matter because, at frontier scale, capability is largely a function of how much compute and talent you can afford. If Anthropic can sustain anything close to this trajectory, it’s no longer a scrappy challenger—it’s a financial peer to OpenAI with a different product mix and safety philosophy.
The split is also instructive: OpenAI remains more consumer‑heavy (ChatGPT web and mobile), while Anthropic is increasingly enterprise‑centric with Claude Code and Claude Team. That means two different feedback loops into model development: one driven by broad consumer usage, the other by demanding knowledge‑work workflows. For the race to AGI, the headline is that both leading frontier labs now have war chests large enough to fund multi‑year, multi‑trillion‑parameter training runs and bespoke hardware deals. The bottleneck is shifting from “can they pay for it?” to “can the grid, the supply chain and governance frameworks keep up?”.

)
