On February 8, 2026, Jiji Press via Nippon.com reported that World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill called for Japan’s cooperation in preventing AI adoption from widening global economic disparities. He argued that productivity gains from AI could drive growth, but uneven access risks deepening inequality unless countries like Japan support technology transfer and investment.
This article aggregates reporting from 1 news source. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The World Bank’s message to Japan is that AI is now central to macroeconomic growth planning, not just a tech‑sector story. Gill’s argument—AI could re‑ignite productivity, but mostly in countries that can afford to deploy it—goes straight to one of the under‑discussed dynamics of the AGI race: unless there is deliberate technology and capability transfer, advanced AI risks reinforcing the lead of already rich, digitally mature economies.
Japan sits at an interesting crossroads. It has world‑class manufacturing, robotics and a strong research base, but it has been slower than the US or China in consumer AI. The World Bank wants Tokyo to lean into its role as a trusted investor and standards‑setter across Asia, helping diffuse AI tools and know‑how in a way that narrows, rather than widens, the global productivity gap. If Japan and multilateral lenders start tying infrastructure finance and trade deals to AI capacity‑building—skills, compute access, localized models—that could meaningfully change who gets to participate in the next wave of automation.

