Pope Leo XIV used his message for the Catholic Church’s World Day of Social Communications to warn that generative AI could erode human identity, blur reality and simulation, and deepen polarization. He called out the concentration of AI power in a few companies and urged stronger governance and youth education on how algorithms shape perceptions.
This article aggregates reporting from 3 news sources. The TL;DR is AI-generated from original reporting. Race to AGI's analysis provides editorial context on implications for AGI development.
The Pope’s intervention on AI is less about technical detail and more about who gets to define the moral frame around increasingly agentic systems. By explicitly warning that generative AI can erode our cognitive, emotional and communicative capacities, and by calling out the small number of firms steering its trajectory, Leo XIV is aligning the Vatican with broader concerns about concentration and manipulation in digital platforms.([philstar.com](https://www.philstar.com/world/2026/01/25/2503386/pope-leo-xiv-warns-against-risks-ai-algorithms))
For the race to AGI, messages like this matter because they shape the social license under which labs and governments operate. If religious and moral authorities frame AGI primarily as a threat to authentic relationships and human dignity, public pressure for strict controls, watermarks and usage bans in sensitive domains will grow. That doesn’t necessarily slow research, but it can strongly influence deployment patterns—pushing more capabilities behind corporate or state firewalls and widening the gap between what’s technically possible and what’s publicly visible.


