As artificial intelligence increasingly permeates sectors like film and education, we are witnessing a paradigm shift where traditional human roles are being re-evaluated and redefined. This trend signals a move towards more automated decision-making processes, yet raises critical concerns about the preservation of human creativity and integrity in cultural outputs, as well as the urgent need for educational systems to adapt to an AI-dominated skill landscape. Stakeholders in the creative and educational fields must navigate these changes to enhance human-centric skills while addressing the challenges of misinformation and algorithmic biases.


An opinion column in Indian daily The Hans India argues that rapid advances in AI and humanoid robotics could trigger mass job displacement and, in the long run, pose an existential threat if highly autonomous machines begin independently evaluating which human roles are 'necessary'. The author notes that companies such as Tesla and Samsung are already demonstrating humanoid robots for household and industrial tasks, and contends that societies must consciously reinforce emotional and ethical values rather than competing to be 'better machines'.
CBC News has updated its internal guidelines on the use of AI, emphasizing that artificial intelligence is a tool, not the creator, of published content. The policy allows AI for assistive tasks like data analysis, drafting suggestions and accessibility services, but bans AI from writing full articles or creating public-facing images or videos, and requires explicit disclosure to audiences when AI plays a significant role in a story.

An investigation by The Drive highlights how suspiciously polished, template-like reviews on a Ford dealership’s CarGurus page appear to be AI-generated, underscoring how generative tools are being used to manipulate dealership reputations. The piece warns that the growing market for AI-assisted ‘reputation management’ further erodes trust in online reviews, making it harder for consumers to distinguish authentic feedback from automated slop. ([thedrive.com](https://www.thedrive.com/news/add-ai-to-the-list-of-reasons-you-cant-trust-online-car-dealer-reviews))

In a Forbes column, leadership expert Julie Kratz, drawing on insights from Instructure chief academic officer Melissa Loble, argues that AI will automate many technical skills and push education systems to prioritize 'human skills' such as critical thinking, decision-making, and contextual reasoning. The piece predicts a shift toward case-based, experiential, and practitioner-led learning as institutions adapt curricula and talent development strategies to a workplace increasingly shaped by AI tools.

In an opinion piece, technology executive Aditya Vikram Kashyap warns that India's massive digital scale makes it especially vulnerable to 'industrialised' AI-driven disinformation, from deepfake political videos to fabricated financial announcements that could move markets. He calls for stronger 'truth infrastructure'—including watermarking of corporate disclosures, liability for platforms that amplify synthetic content, and better public digital literacy—to counter what he terms the 'disinformation dividend'.

A column in Nepal’s Kathmandu Post argues that generative AI systems, trained on massive scraped datasets and optimized for plausible prediction rather than truth, are already transforming how news is produced and consumed, often in ways invisible to audiences. The authors warn that as AI-generated text and images flood the information ecosystem without clear labeling, it becomes harder to distinguish reporting from simulation, threatening public trust and democratic deliberation unless newsrooms develop stronger standards, verification practices and governance around AI use.
In a column in Egypt’s state‑owned Al‑Ahram, critic Essam Saad explores how AI is moving beyond editing and screenwriting assistance to influence the management of film festivals, from scheduling and audience analytics to jury selection. While acknowledging efficiency gains, the article warns that over‑automating festival decisions could erode the human, emotional and cultural dimensions of cinema events, turning them into "cold" algorithmic systems and raising broader questions about AI’s role in artistic gatekeeping.